Contemporary Smile Design: An Orthodontic Perspective.

Orthodontists play a vital role in the smile design of individuals. There are a variety of orthodontic goals and tooth movements that can be achieved to obtain the ideal smile that ultimately leads to the optimum esthetic outcomes. In this article, some methods and appliance systems to control and achieve the desired tooth movements are described and illustrated.

A randomized trial on the effects of root resorption after orthodontic treatment using pulsating force.

BACKGROUND: An orthodontic device that moves teeth with pulsating force was invented and underwent a single center, controlled, clinical trial to test its safety and efficacy for treatment. The device has a custom-made thermo-plastic mouthpiece which fits over the teeth with an inflatable silicone element. A console that measures and controls the pulsating force level in real-time controls the air pressure that delivers a pulsating force. In this study, the effect of the device on root resorption during orthodontic treatment was evaluated using 3D cone beam computed tomography and compared with a control group of patients who received Invisalign treatment. METHODS: Twenty-eight subjects were enrolled in the investigational arm and 15 in the control group. Subjects were followed until the average score of the mandibular and maxillary teeth achieved a Little's Irregularity Index of 1.5 mm or less. RESULTS: There were no adverse events reported throughout the study for either treatment arm. No clinically significant root resorption was observed for either group. The investigational device did not cause root resorption greater than the control group. Both devices produced a safety profile compared to current orthodontic techniques. CONCLUSION: The investigational device did not produce more root resorption than similar conventional orthodontic appliances. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03421886 . Registered 12 January 2018 - Retrospectively registered.

Rating of smile attractiveness of patients finished to the American Board of Orthodontics standards.

BACKGROUND: This study collected 68 smiling photos of cases taken to American Board of Orthodontics clinical exam and were considered as successfully treated. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A panel of 52 raters from different specialties and laypeople were asked to rate the smile attractiveness on a scale from 1-10 and to also choose what components made the smile less attractive. Simple descriptive statistics were used to determine the mean, standard deviations, and quartiles of the smile attractiveness. Multilinear regression (MLR) analysis was used to examine the relationship of smile attractiveness when the variables of age, professional experience, and gender of the raters were considered. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) was created to correlate the association between smile attractiveness and the perfect smile. RESULTS: The mean rating of each picture ranged from 3.42 ± 1.83 (least attractive smile) to 8.46 ± 1.59 (most attractive smile). The overall mean for smile attractiveness was 6.23 ± 1.09; additionally, it was found that problematic teeth, gum, and lips reduce the smile attractiveness score by 1.7, 1.7, and 1.2, respectively. CONCLUSION: The study showed that only 2 out of 68 American Board of Orthodontics treatment finishes had an attractive and perfect smile.

Evaluation of temporomandibular joint function after orthognathic surgery using a jaw tracker.

OBJECTIVE: It has been reported that temporomandibular joint (TMJ) function after orthognathic surgery differs from normal patients. Dysfunction of the joints occurs often even in the general public, with an incidence in the range of 20%-25%. Population-based studies among adults report that approximately 10%-15% have symptoms of pain and 5% of them had a perceived need for treatment. To date, no studies have reported on the evaluation of TMJ function after orthognathic surgery through the use of four-dimensional jaw tracking. DESIGN AND SETTING: This study evaluated TMJ function using such a device and information from a TMJ questionnaire. Sixteen orthognathic surgery patients and 17 controls were included in this study. Four-dimensional jaw tracking information was obtained using the SiCAT JMT device. Clinical signs and jaw function were evaluated. RESULTS: Within the limitations of the study, the following results were seen using the SICAT JMT+ jaw tracking device: (1) no significant differences were found in any of the millimetric measurements between the surgery patients and controls; (2) no significant difference was found in subjective reported symptoms of pain, clicking, crepitation, locking, stiffness, headaches and migraines between the groups; and (3)there was a significant difference in the popping of the joints for surgery and non-surgery groups. CONCLUSION: Jaw tracking did not detect significant differences in jaw function, but some clinical symptoms were present.

Smile outcome comparison of Invisalign and traditional fixed-appliance treatment: A case-control study.

INTRODUCTION: The purpose of this study was to evaluate and compare smile treatment outcomes between patients treated with Invisalign clear aligners (Align Technology, Santa Clara, Calif) and those treated with traditional fixed appliances by integrating variables such as lip symmetry, smile index, smile cant, buccal corridors, and gingival display into smile outcome evaluation. METHODS: Records from 58 patients, 29 of whom received Invisalign treatment (mean age 19.03 years) and 29 of whom received traditional fixed-appliance treatment (mean age 13.83 years), were compared for their smile outcome. Pretreatment scores, posttreatment scores, and differences between within-group smile score before and after treatment were determined for each group. Fifteen variables comprised the smile outcome, and the data were analyzed with the Mann-Whitney U test and the Wilcoxon t test for 2 dependent samples. RESULTS: Six variables within the fixed-appliance group presented with better smile scores than those within the Invisalign group; buccal corridors (%) (mean difference = 8.42%), buccal corridors (mm) (5.35 mm), smile cant (0.42°), maxillary dental midline (0.21 mm), gingival display (0.56 mm), and smile index (1.09%) for P <0.05. Invisalign performed better on 2 variables that determined maxillary incisor position (1.26 mm) and inclination (2.09°). No significant difference (for P = 0.05) was shown between pretreatment and posttreatment scores for either of the 2 groups. CONCLUSIONS: Using the 15 variables in this study, the results suggested that for patients with Class I nonextraction, treatment with traditional fixed appliances changes the patient's smile more than Invisalign treatment, and fixed appliances appear to be more effective in improving the variables that quantify posttreatment smile outcome.

Clinical effectiveness of orthodontic treatment on smile esthetics: a systematic review.

Objectives: The aim of this systematic review is to identify how different types of orthodontic interventions affect the esthetics of the smile, any time after orthodontic treatment. Materials and methods: A systematic search of the literature was carried out using 5 electronic databases (PubMed, Embase, The Cochrane Library, Scopus, Dentistry and Oral Sciences Source) that included articles until October 2017. Randomized and non-randomized controlled clinical trials, case-control observational studies, and cohort and cross-sectional studies with validated data collection and/or follow-up periods reporting on orthodontic interventions that changed the smile any time after orthodontic treatment were part of the study protocol. Only studies that were published in the English language and those that had human patients of any age and gender who underwent orthodontic treatment were included. Results: A total of 814 articles were found and 9 of them were included (7 cohort and 2 cross-sectional studies). Among the selected articles, 8 stated the type of orthodontic intervention used during treatment and 1 did not specify the intervention. Eight articles were judged of moderate risk and 1 had high risk of bias. Conclusion: Orthodontic treatment affects the esthetics of the smile in three dimensions. There was slight evidence that extractions do not affect the smile width and buccal corridors area. Evidence on palatal expansion was controversial. The remaining existing data evidence that investigated smile esthetics after orthodontic treatment was uncertain. Therefore, more validated, evidence-based studies are needed.

Effect of fluoride dentifrices on white spot lesions during orthodontic treatment: A randomized trial.

OBJECTIVES: To determine the effect of Clinpro 5000, Clinpro Tooth Crème, and MI-Paste Plus on the formation of white spot lesions in patients undergoing orthodontic treatment. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Three prospective groups with 40 patients undergoing orthodontic treatment in each group were evaluated (total recruitment = 120 subjects). The selected product was brushed on for 2 minutes twice daily for 4 months. Subjects were reviewed for 4 months on a monthly basis. The Enamel Decalcification Index (EDI) was used to determine the number of white spot lesions per surface at each visit. RESULTS: 100 subjects (35 using Clinpro 5000, 32 using Clinpro Tooth Crème, and 33 using MI Paste Plus) completed the study. The data lend strong support for Clinpro 5000 providing superior protection against enamel decalcification when compared to Clinpro Crème, and mixed support when compared to MI Paste Plus. CONCLUSIONS: The use of Clinpro 5000, Clinpro Crème, and MI paste Plus all have a reduction effect on white spot lesions when compared to studies reported previously. Clinpro 5000 has a marginally better effect than the two other test pastes. The results of this study can be used by clinicians when deciding the effectiveness of using fluoride dentifrice products to prevent white spot lesions in their orthodontic practice (ClinicalTrials.gov ID: NCT03440996).

Three-dimensional Analysis of Normal Facial Morphologies of Asians and Whites: A Novel Method of Quantitative Analysis.

The purpose of this study is to compare 3-dimensional facial averages of Asians (Koreans and Chinese) and Houstonian white faces using a (3-dimensional) surface imaging system. METHODS: Three-dimensional images of Korean adults (Seoul, Korea) with class I malocclusion captured using the 3dMDface. The images of 138 Koreans were processed to generate average male and female facial shells using Rapidform 2006 plus pack 2 software and then superimposed and compared with the average shells of Chinese adults (Xi' An, China) and white adults (Houston, Tex.). RESULTS: The average Korean male and female faces were wider with prominent malar and zygomatic areas when compared with the white faces. The average white male and female faces showed more protrusion in the glabella, nasion, rhinion, and the soft-tissue pogonion than the Korean faces. The average Korean male face was retrusive at masseteric region while having more prominent lips, nasal tip, and supraglabella than the Chinese counterpart. The average Korean female face was narrower than the average Chinese female face, but there was more protrusion in the periorbital, nasal tip, and malar region seen in the Korean female face. CONCLUSIONS: Although the average faces of Chinese and Korean populations in this study showed remarkable similarities, there were distinct differences seen in the facial morphology of the 2 Asian groups. Three-dimensional imaging can be effectively used to establish population facial norms and to quantify the variations seen between different ethnicities. This information may be used in the clinical environment for plastic, oral, and maxillofacial surgery and orthodontics.

The use of three-dimensional evaluation in the management of a complex patient with mandibular fracture: a 5-year evaluation.

AIM: The aims of this study were to diagnose and evaluate a case of severe condylar fracture followed up over 5 years using three-dimensional imaging for soft tissue and hard tissue. METHODS: The patient underwent reconstruction with an autogenous rib graft to correct the resorbed left condyle secondary to a previous fracture and to balance her facial asymmetry. Orthodontic treatment is ongoing to equilibrize the occlusion and dentofacial complex. A stereo-photogrammetric system (3dMDFace System) was used to capture the soft tissue image of the patient. In addition, a cone-beam computed tomography (Kodak 9500) was used for hard tissue acquisition. The resultant images were analyzed using Rapidform 6 (RP6) and 3dMDvultus three-dimensional software packages, for 3 time frames: before surgery (T1), 1 month after surgery (T2), and 8 months after surgery (T3). RESULTS: Using three-dimensional software to analyze the three-dimensional data, several findings were noted: (1) soft tissue compensation of the hard tissue deformity for the facial asymmetry was around 7 mm; (2) color mapping and histograms helped identify distinct facial differences represented by positive changes of the patient's face because of the mandible reconstruction at T1-T2 and the mandible moving to its normal position at T3-T4. CONCLUSIONS: Three-dimensional imaging provides more accurate information and virtual representation of the patient. This leads to better diagnosis and treatment planning. In addition, the preliminary results of this study showed supportive evidence for the use of rib grafts in children.

A 3D analysis of Caucasian and African American facial morphologies in a US population.

INTRODUCTION: This study aimed to compare facial morphologies of an adult African-American population to an adult Caucasian-American population using three-dimensional (3D) surface imaging. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The images were captured using a stereophotogrammetric system (3dMDface(TM) system). Subjects were aged 19-30 years, with normal body mass index and no gross craniofacial anomalies. Images were aligned and combined using RF6 Plus Pack 2 software to produce a male and female facial average for each population. The averages were superimposed and the differences were assessed. RESULTS: The most distinct differences were in the forehead, alar base and perioricular regions. The average difference between African-American and Caucasian-American females was 1·18±0·98 mm. The African-American females had a broader face, wider alar base and more protrusive lips. The Caucasian-American females had a more prominent chin, malar region and lower forehead. The average difference between African-American and Caucasian-American males was 1·11±1·04 mm. The African-American males had a more prominent upper forehead and periocular region, wider alar base and more protrusive lips. No notable difference occurred between chin points of the two male populations. CONCLUSIONS: Average faces were created from 3D photographs, and the facial morphological differences between populations and genders were compared. African-American males had a more prominent upper forehead and periocular region, wider alar base and more protrusive lips. Caucasian-American males showed a more prominent nasal tip and malar area. African-American females had broader face, wider alar base and more protrusive lips. Caucasian-American females showed a more prominent chin point, malar region and lower forehead.

Modified method of analysis for surgical correction of facial asymmetry.

INTRODUCTION: The aim of this article was to present a new method of analysis using a three dimensional (3D) model of an actual patient with facial asymmetry, for the assessment of her facial changes and the quantification of the deformity. This patient underwent orthodontic and surgical treatment to correct a severe facial asymmetry. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The surgical procedure was complex and the case was challenging. The treatment procedure required an orthodontic approach followed by Le Fort I osteotomy, bilateral sagittal split osteotomy, septorhinoplasty and chin advancement. The imaging devices used in this paper is the 3dMDface system (Atlanta, GA) and the Kodak 9500 Cone Beam 3D system device (Atlanta, GA). 3D digital stereophotogrammetric cameras were used for image acquisition and a reverse modeling software package, the Rapidform 2006 Software (INUS Technology, Seoul, Korea) was applied for surface registration. The images were also combined and analyzed using the 3dMD vultus (Atlanta, GA) software and InVivoDental 5.2.3 (San Jose, CA). All data gathered from previously mentioned sources were adjusted to the patient's natural head position. RESULTS: The 3D images of the patient were taken and analyzed in three time frames; before orthodontics and surgical treatment (T1), at the end of orthodontic therapy and before surgery (T2) and about 2 months after surgery (T3). The patient showed significant improvement of her skeletal discrepancy between T1 and T3. In addition, there were some dentoalveolar changes between T1 and T2 as expected. The 3D analysis of surgical changes on the 3D models correlated very well to the actual surgical movements. CONCLUSIONS: The use of these 3D imaging tools offer a reliable accuracy to accessing and quantifying changes that occur after surgery. This study shows supportive evidence for the use of 3D imaging techniques.